3 . The Strict Scrutiny standard applies in cases where in that respect is an allegation of a fourteenth amendment violation that is predicated on draw . The Court determined that there are various take aims of exam regarding laws or regulations that mention suspect groups and afford them differing treatments . The top level of interrogatory is applied to those laws and policies that use race as a determining factor in their provisions . The strict interrogation standard requires that the law-making body prove that the provision serves a legitimate interest of the government or institution , and that the distinction return on race is necessary to bring about the bank result . The majority applies the strict scrutiny rule by emphasizing the legitimacy of the law School s interest in having a substantial fix of minority students in to sire the entire student body with a realistic world-view with suffer to minority viewpoints .

They laud the Law school s policy as one of holistic considerations , of which one happens to be race , in contrast to a strict numbers-quota system . They thus comply that the policy does not violate the equal protection term of the 14th AmendmentThe stand firming viewpoint , on the other even up water , rejects the critical hole argument as a make interest of the state , rather that the determination of critical mass does nothing more than assuring the status of the school as a prestigious one among compara ble institutions This , according to the ho! ld out , fails to meet the standards of the strict scrutiny evaluation . The reason...If you want to come across at a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.